(2) When Seetaa, daughter of a King, daughter-in- law of a King and the consort of a future King was abducted by Raavan and held captive in Lanka.

(3) When Raam asked Seetaa to give a proof of Her faithfulness by Agni Pareekshaa (Fire Test)

(4) When Raam banished pregnant Seetaa from Ayodhyaa without telling Her.

(5) When Raam invited Her to accept Her, but still on the condition that She would have to give proof of Her chastity. This time She could not bear it and died.

The Mahabharata is a chronicle of a series of crises coming upon the kingdom of Hastinaapur, the Paandav and Kaurav......

(1) Dhritrashtra's main point of rage is that, in spite of being the first-born his blindness denied him the throne; rage which became the root cause for everything till he went to forest in the end.

(2) Duryodhans illegitimate claim to the throne of Hastinaapur.

(3) Vivisection of the kingdom between Duryodhan and Yudhishthir.

(4) Yudhishthir staking Indraprasth in the game of dice and losing the kingdom to Duryodhan.

(5) Yudhishthir staking his brothers and his wife in the game and losing everything to Shakuni's crafty roll of the dice.

(6) The Kaurav disrobing Draupadee in the court.

(7) The inaction and impotence of the elders in Hastinaapur when the kingdom was vivisected, when the game of dice was played, when Yudhishthir staked his kingdom in the game, when Draupadee was dishonored, and when Shakuni looted Paandav's kingdom by crafty roll of dice.

(8) When Duryodhan does not agree to give Paandav's kingdom back to them, and not only their kingdom but even five villages; and not only five villages but the earth equal to the tip of he needle.

(9) Killing of Abhimanyu by 6 Mahaarathee together....  the list is long

As the series of crises unfolded in Ayodhyaa, Hastinaapur and Indraprasth, the most striking feature in the narration is that in the Raamaayan, the ordinary people of Ayodhyaa are heard and seen during the crises; and all action before, during and after the crises takes place equally in the courts, on the streets and on the battlefield; in the Mahaabhaarat however, we do not see or hear the ordinary people of Hastinaapur and Indraprasth and all action takes place only in the court and in the battlefield.

In the Raamaayan, the Prajaa is heard and is seen because both Dasharath and Shree Raam are submitted to Dharm; while in the Mahaabhaarat, unrestrained greed for the throne and the fatal penchant for gambling rendered Dhritraashtra, Duryodhan and Yudhishthir impervious not only to public opinion but also to the well-being of their citizens. The people of Hastinaapur and Indraprasth are therefore invisible and voiceless. In Hindu tradition of Raaj Dharm mere numbers on the street or its absence do not influence the actions of the state; the Hindu state by definition is Dhaarmik.

Notwithstanding the fact that every citizen of Ayodhyaa, without exception, was angry when King Dasharath was forced to consent to Bharat succeeding to the throne instead of Raam, but Raam rejected the voice of the people who followed him in his exile and proceeded to the forests. The numbers were undoubtedly on Raam's side. Raam therefore did not use the voice of the people to overrule his father; instead he chided the people of Ayodhyaa for threatening revolt and urged them to remain loyal to the King and to serve Bharat with the same affection and loyalty that they were professing for Him.

Much later in the historical narrative when Raam was informed that there were muted whispers against his decision to have by his side a woman who had been held captive in another man's home, notwithstanding the fact that the numbers were on the side of Seetaa, Raam submitted to what he considered was the ideal in Raaj Dharm, and banished pregnant Seetaa to the forests.

Such was the faith of the people of Ayodhyaa in Shree Raam's adherence to Dharm that in the first instance, in absolute obedience to Shree Raam's exhortation, they did not rise up in revolt against Dasharath or Bharat and in the second instance the vast majority of the people of Ayodhyaa who were deeply pained and even angered by Seetaa's exile, did not rise up in revolt against Shree Raam nor did they pick up arms against those elements in society which had brought these crises upon Ayodhyaa.

Which Wives Asked Their Husband for Good Clothes and Jewelry?
There are some women who have asked or got good clothes and jewelry before giving children to their Rishi husbands... All these girls were the daughters of kings. When they married to Rishi they took off their all royal attire and wore Aashram clothes after marrying them.

(1) Maharshi Kardam
Kardam Muni's wife Devahooti, Manu's daughter, did not ask for these, but Kardam Rishi himself gave her all these things before having children from her. kardam Muni, pleased with her services gave the fruits of all his Tap, built a Vimaan, gave her beauty and the enjoyed with her for many years and gave her 9 daughters assuming 9 forms and the in the last gave her Bhagavaan as her son - Kapil Dev.
[Bhaagvat Puraan, 3/10]

(2) Agastya Rishi
When Agastya Rishi wanted to have children from Lopaamudraa, daughter of a King, she particularly asked him to give her good clothes and jewelry before it, even she asked him to come to her in good clothes and flower garland.. Agastya Muni said - "Where I will bring all these for you, I am only a Rishi." Lopaamudraa said - "You are a Rishi, you can do anything." Agastya Muni did not want to waste his Tap on such trivial things, so when Lopaamudraa did not agree, he went to several kings to ask for money but he found that they were not able to give him that much money. Then one king told him about Ilval Daitya. He went to him, but he wanted to kill him, so he offered him food which Agastya Muni ate and digested it. Then he gave him lots of wealth and with that wealth Agastya Muni could satisfy Lopaamudraa.
[MBH, G-4-Van/17]

(3) Chyavan Muni
Chyavan Muni was married to Raajaa Sharyaati's daughter Sukanyaa. So when Chyavan asked Sukanyaa to give him a child, she asked him to give her good clothes and jewelry before coming to her. He told her that he was a Rishi, where he would bring all that from? She replied that he had the power of Tap, he could use it to produce them from anywhere, but he also did not get ready to waste his tap on such trivial things. Later, Ashwinee Kumaar
[Bhavishya Puraan, 1/7]

Bhrigu and Tri-Dev
It seems